acapixus01.gif (7718 bytes)


Comparison of rectilinear versus rectilinearized 111° hAOV of
    Sigma AF 12-24 mm f/4.5-5.6 EX DG zoom @ 12 mm
    Canon EF 15 mm f/2.8 fisheye and 
    Sigma AF 8 mm f/4.0 EX fisheye
on a Canon EOS 5D

Start - Centre - APS-C edge - Edge - Summary

The Sigma AF 12-24 f:4.5-5.6 EX DG is often criticized for poor sharpness, but the truth is that for such a lens providing such a wide field of view it is really quite admirably sharp. And there is currently (April 2007) no other lens commercially available that provides an equally wide field of view, not even a prime lens.

The Canon EF 15 mm f/2.8 fisheye compares quite favourably in the centre and what corresponds to the APS-C edge, but it can not compete at the far edge. The Sigma AF 8 mm f/4.0 EX due to its smaller image projection circle really has no chance of providing a resolution similar to the other two lenses.

So, while the rectilinear by design Sigma 12-24 mm zoom provides the best overall resolution at 111° hAOV the rectilinear remapped images from the fisheye lenses would suffice for smaller reproductions. However, if appropriate for the particular use images from these lenses are best remapped to some projection other than rectilinear, i.e. the rectangular projection provided by RectFish. In this way the fisheye lenses can provide sharp images with a much wider field of view than even the Sigma 12-24 mm zoom.

AcaPixus, April 2007

 

 Copenhagen Botanical Garden greenhouse

Canon EOS 5D with Canon EF 15 mm f/2.8
Image remapped to rectilinear 141° hAOV using RectFish
 

Canon EOS 5D with Sigma AF 8 mm f/4.0
Image remapped to rectangular 180° hAOV using RectFish

 


Software for remapping fisheye
images into a rectangular projection